Trump’s lawyers urged a federal judge to reject an effort to reopen the dismissed lawsuit that led to the $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund, according to a .
Read more GOP group kicked off campus over antisemitism fails to prove free speech violation: NYT
Attorneys for Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization argued in the Southern District of Florida filing that a group of 35 former federal judges have “no standing” to challenge the settlement that ended the case and created the anti-weaponization fund.
Trump sued the IRS for $10 billion after a contractor leaked his tax returns, which led to the settlement with an agency he oversees as president. However, the judges’ theory that the settlement was collusive “is not a legal standard,” the filing added.
Read more ‘Genuine rigging!’ Nobel-winning economist sees a ‘Ponzi scheme’ in SpaceX’s valuation
“It is a policy objection dressed as a fraud claim,” the filing described the judges’ case. “It does not warrant the extraordinary remedy of reopening a closed case.”
The defense of the fund comes shortly after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the Department of Justice would not move ahead with it. Blanche declined to put that in writing, however.
Read more CNN’s Kaitlan Collins in the crosshairs after Trump DOJ decision: strategist
