An MS NOW host argued Sunday that President Donald Trump squandered a rare political gift — a bipartisan housing bill that could have eased financial pressure on millions of Americans — because he “threw a temper tantrum,” choosing instead to hold the legislation hostage to his voter ID agenda.
Read more Fox’s Peter Doocy mocked for hyping turnout for Trump event — in front of near-empty field
In an opening monologue, the host laid out what they framed as a baffling self-inflicted wound. Trump, he said, “had the opportunity to actually do something that could ease the financial burdens for countless Americans” and could have signed “the largest housing affordability bill in a generation” — a rare bipartisan measure that would have handed his own party something to campaign on in November.
“It could have taken an easy W, which doesn’t come often in this political climate,” the host said.
Instead, the host argued, Trump “threw a temper tantrum” and is “now holding that bill hostage” until Congress passes the SAVE Act, his voter ID legislation that critics say could disenfranchise millions of voters. The host summed up the dynamic bluntly: “holding affordability hostage to leverage voting restrictions.”
The host was joined by Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), who offered a withering read of the president’s priorities.
“We’re talking about a guy who pretends to love America,” Lee said. “They love the symbolism, the ideology, but they don’t love the people.”
Read more ‘Presidents don’t do this’: Trump ridiculed for tour of remodeling projects amid turmoil
Lee argued that when given a genuine chance to help “his own voters, for all voters across America, for poor and working class people, he won’t do it.” The reason, she contended, is that the administration’s goal “is to help and enrich themselves, their own people, and we’re all just along for the ride,” whether Democrat, Republican, or independent.
Pressed on whether she had spoken with Republican colleagues furious about Trump torpedoing the bill, Lee acknowledged she hadn’t directly, but said the political reality was obvious — that lawmakers in both parties need something to show voters, and the housing bill “would have done so.”
Lee also drew a sharp contrast between the money available for the military and the funds denied to domestic programs, pointing to a $1.5 trillion defense request and “a request for a war that the vast majority of Americans and the rest of the world do not want,” even as the administration says the country “cannot put people in housing.”
“Americans lose,” the lawmaker said, arguing Republicans “have nothing to go back to run on” but cautioning that political self-interest “shouldn’t be the reason that they do it.”
She closed by warning that voters squeezed by grocery and housing costs are “starting to get pissed off” and demanding answers — a reckoning, she said, that “every elected official is going to have to answer for, not just in November, but ongoing.”
Read more Trump ‘on the brink’ of receiving historic shellacking from Supreme Court: law professor
